February
5, 2007
High
and Dry — Are Apprenticeships the Answer to the Coder Shortage?
By Martin Smith, MEd, RHIT, CCA
For The Record
Vol. 19 No. 3 P. 20
To combat the dearth of medical coders, a college
professor proposes that hospitals invest the time and money to tutor
new coders—before it’s too late.
In 1998, the leaders of the Metropolitan Police Service
at London’s New Scotland Yard knew they were in trouble. For centuries,
they had been successful at policing one of the largest cities in the
world. However, they knew they needed to improve the force’s corporate
image and its service quality.
So, under much scrutiny and a large investment of time
and money, it launched the Plus Program. This action went against the
core beliefs and values that had existed for centuries and significantly
altered attitudes within the police service.
Today, the Metropolitan Police Service employs more
than 45,000 people and has managed to progress into the 21st century,
dealing with numerous challenges while maintaining the public’s
trust and building on its historic roots.
This situation is analogous to the one faced in the
coding profession, where we constantly hear and read about a shortage
of medical coders—yet it appears the chasm between those who have
been in the industry for many years and those doing their utmost to
break into it continues to widen.
How do we begin to effect the change we need to move
forward? In ancient times, teaching and learning were accomplished through
apprenticeship: We taught our children how to speak, grow crops, craft
cabinets, or tailor clothes by showing them how and by helping them
do it. Apprenticeship was the vehicle for transmitting the knowledge
required for expert practice in fields from painting and sculpting to
medicine and law. It was the natural way to learn.
In modern times, apprenticeship has largely been replaced
by formal schooling. It has become apparent that schooling by itself
is not enough and additional hands-on training is required.
“We just don’t have the time to train any
new coders,” I hear you say. You are so busy doing more and more
with less and less that you simply don’t have the time. Eventually,
this can be fatal to any organization. In today’s competitive
marketplace, what happens to a hospital that doesn’t continually
invest in upgrading its employees’ skills? It’s the same
thing that would happen to a championship football or baseball team
that doesn’t practice every day. Soon, they are no longer winners.
Many managers are confronted by employees and students
who want a chance. These people want to develop their skills and help
the hospital succeed. Many coding and health information managers just
don’t know how to respond. So, like many people, when they don’t
know how to do something, they avoid it. Perhaps we should examine our
past and consider the apprenticeship system to solve this problem.
The Apprenticeship System
In a traditional apprenticeship, the expert shows the apprentice how
to perform a task, watches as the apprentice practices portions of the
task, then turns over more responsibility until the apprentice is proficient
enough to accomplish the task independently. That is the basic notion
of apprenticeship—showing the apprentice how to do a task and
helping the apprentice do it.
There are four important aspects of traditional apprenticeships:
modeling, scaffolding, fading, and coaching.
In modeling, the student observes the trainer demonstrating
how to do different parts of the task. The trainer makes the target
processes visible, often by explicitly showing the student what to do,
and much of the learning occurs as students watch others at work.
Scaffolding is the support the trainer gives students
in carrying out a task. This can range from doing almost the entire
task for them to giving occasional hints as to what to do next. Fading
is the notion of slowly removing the support, giving the student more
and more responsibility.
Coaching is the thread running through the entire apprenticeship
experience. The trainer coaches the apprentice through a wide range
of activities, including choosing tasks, providing hints and scaffolding,
evaluating student activities, diagnosing problems, issuing challenges,
offering encouragement, giving feedback, structuring the way to complete
tasks, and working on particular weaknesses. In short, coaching is the
process of overseeing the student’s learning.
The interplay involved in observation, scaffolding,
and increasingly independent practice aids students both in developing
self-monitoring and correction skills and integrating the skills and
conceptual knowledge needed to advance toward expertise. Giving students
a conceptual model—a picture of the whole—is an important
factor in apprenticeship’s success in teaching complex skills
without resorting to lengthy practice of isolated subskills for three
reasons.
First, it provides learners with an advanced organizer
for their initial attempts to execute a complex skill, thus allowing
them to concentrate more attention on execution than would otherwise
be possible. Second, a conceptual model provides an interpretive structure
for making sense of the feedback, hints, and corrections from the master
during interactive coaching sessions. Third, it provides an internalized
guide when the apprentice is engaged in relatively independent practice.
Cognitive Apprenticeship
Cognitive apprenticeship is not a model of teaching that gives teachers
a packaged formula for instruction. Instead, it is an instructional
paradigm for teaching. Cognitive apprenticeship is not a relevant model
for all aspects of teaching. It does not make sense to use it to teach
the rules of conjugation in French or the elements of the periodic table.
If the targeted goal of learning is a rote task, cognitive apprenticeship
is not an appropriate model of instruction.
Cognitive apprenticeship is a useful instructional paradigm
when a teacher needs to teach a fairly complex task to students, such
as coding. It does not require that the teacher permanently assume the
role of the “expert”—in fact, we would imagine that
the opposite should happen. Trainers need to encourage students to explore
questions trainers cannot answer, challenge solutions the “experts”
have found—in short, to allow the role of “expert”
and “student” to be transformed. Cognitive apprenticeship
encourages the student to become the expert, a key element in coding.
How might a manager apply the ideas of cognitive apprenticeship
to his or her department? There is not a formula for implementing the
activities of modeling, scaffolding, fading, and coaching. Ultimately,
the trainer must identify ways in which cognitive apprenticeship can
work in his or her own facility.
Apprenticeship is the way we learn most naturally. It
characterized learning before there were schools, from learning one’s
language to learning how to run an empire. There are successful models
of how apprenticeship methods, in all their dimensions, can be applied
to teaching the school curriculum of reading, writing, and mathematics.
Trainers can create their own models and develop the framework, which
will help point the way toward the redesign of developing the new wave
of medical coders so students may better acquire expertise and problem
solving skills, as well as an improved ability to learn throughout life.
How Can We Apply This
Idea?
How can we begin the process of change? We can by establishing a culture
that encourages innovation and risk-taking; developing processes that
identify new ideas and brings the most promising quickly to prototype;
and utilizing IT to enable these processes and provide a mechanism for
sharing knowledge. Successful, sustainable innovation requires a holistic
business model built on these foundations. As Eleanor Roosevelt once
said, “Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events;
small minds discuss people.”
In today’s global market, all business practices
can ultimately be communicated and copied by others. New machines and
IT applications can be bought off the shelf immediately. Replicating
healthcare processes is more difficult; replicating an organization’s
culture and knowledge is the most difficult of all. Although it may
sound trite, a hospital’s people are its most valuable asset—but
only if that knowledge and those skills are fully utilized.
Creating a culture that empowers employees and encourages
and rewards innovation and risk-taking is critical. Supporting this
with effective training processes to help the collection, codification,
and communication of an organization’s knowledge will deliver
the highest return on its people assets. What kind of ongoing coding
training do you have where you work?
At first glance, it may seem that the notion of building
mentor/apprentice relationships places a burden on us, but this does
not have to be the case. The highest calling of exemplary leaders is
to build leadership in others, and effective managers recognize this.
Managers who engage with their employees as mentors will find themselves
reflecting on their own practice and grow as a result. Finally, managers
who invest in building the capacity of their subordinates increase their
own effectiveness as they build the strength of their teams.
There is a risk, based on previous experience, that
once you have spent the time and resources training employees, they
will leave for the facility down the street for 50 cents more per hour
or go to work for a contract agency. Developing an agreement for all
employees, based on mutual understanding and trust, is one way to prevent
this type of constant turnover. Some elements of this agreement to consider
might be:
• You and your facility commit to shared training
outcomes.
• The development of students/employees through
structured training in the form an apprenticeship.
• Develop future employees who have the skills,
attitudes, behaviors, and courage to lead and train in a manner that
will maximize the learning of all students.
• Design the role of an employee in a manner that
supports the work of the trainer as a leader within your organization.
• Design the apprenticeship program and trainers
in a manner where the new coders who qualify for these positions not
only survive but thrive.
One of the most important and difficult jobs of a leader
is to gauge the need for organizational change, relate it to the business
environment, then convince the “troops” and your boss that
organizational change is not only necessary but desirable. “Growing
our own” can demonstrate that one way to cope with the coding
shortage is establishing explicit mentor/apprentice relationships within
existing organizational structures. Everyone benefits when we build
leadership within our own ranks.
When the external environment is in sync with the organizational
strategy and behaviors, then change comes in the form of fine-tuning
rather than massive transition. As a leader, now is the time to initiate
change. Often, natural forces clash with the process of change, making
it difficult to implement. This is normal and a common aspect of human
behavior. But leaders can deal with this resistance if they understand
its origins.
In summary, you need to be cognizant that humans resist
change at every turn. That is probably an overstatement, but it is not
far from the truth. As you determine the change required to adjust your
department to the external environment, back up and assess the likelihood
of change being successful. Pick ways in which you can achieve early
success so all in the organization will embrace your change. Seeking
help at every juncture of this process in addition to networking at
a local level will help as you progress.
Remember what Alvin Toffler once said: “The illiterate
of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but
those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn.”
Now ask yourself, am I a leader?
— Martin Smith, MEd, RHIT, CCA, is a faculty
member in St. Petersburg (Fla.) College’s HIM program.
Subscribe
to For the Record Magazine! |