April 17, 2006
Managing
Physician Compliance
By Christopher Rehm, MD
For The Record
Vol. 18 No. 8 P. 10
Many HIM supervisors and managers may not realize
they have the resources to streamline the transcription process
and minimize human errors at their disposal. And, little do they
realize that a number of simple techniques and new technologies
are available to increase physician compliance and decrease turnaround
times (TATs).
At major hospitals, annual transcription costs often
exceed $1 million. Since the accuracy and speed of transcription
services is directly tied to the welfare of patients, HIM managers
should be proactive about training hospital personnel on the proper
procedures and adopting new technologies that can simplify the process.
The two most important measures of transcription
service are quality and TAT. Avoiding mistakes at the start of the
transcription process—specifically, in dictation—can
prevent costly delays and potential confusion. The following steps
will help HIM managers understand and correct the most common mistakes
physicians make during transcription.
• Explain the importance of entering data
completely and correctly. Identifying the patient is the most critical
step in the transcription process. When dictating over the phone,
there are typically four pieces of information the doctor needs
to input with each report: physician ID, medical record number or
visit code, work type, and location. Entering the proper numbers
and codes into the system, however, can be a tedious step that busy
physicians may neglect.
Without all the necessary codes, the automated system
will not be able to process the transcription file and make it available
to a medical transcriptionist (MT). Instead, the file will be removed
from the normal workflow for correction. These corrections must
be made by a human, which significantly increases TAT.
Whether transcription services are performed in
house or outsourced, HIM managers have the opportunity to explain
to doctors how data omissions disrupt the normal transcription process
and affect the speed of services. Physicians who fully understand
the transcription process are more conscientious about entering
the data correctly.
• Encourage the use of correct templates.
Whether dictation is transmitted by phone or digital voice recorder,
every healthcare provider and their transcription partner agree
in advance on the template to be used with each work type to ensure
the transcription information is complete and readily identifiable.
Physicians do not always comply with this template, generally because
they have not been properly trained or do not understand its importance.
When a doctor deviates from the template, it becomes increasingly
likely that important information will be overlooked, omitted, or
inserted into the wrong place. It also becomes confusing, if not
impossible, for the MT to follow the information.
In these cases, the MT may find it necessary to
flag the transcription file for additional research. Generally,
this is performed by a separate department. Researchers must analyze,
organize, and correct the disorganized information in the transcription
file before returning it to the customer. Naturally, adding steps
and personnel to the process adds time and potentially lowers the
quality of patient care.
• Discourage doctors from stringing dictations
together. Many physicians will properly enter the demographic information
for the first patient they saw that day but will then continue dictating
for additional patients. When individual reports run together like
this, it may lead to physicians accidentally omitting vital patient
information, giving incorrect data, or transitioning from patient
to patient so quickly that important identifiers become inaudible.
It then becomes imperative for the MT to properly identify each
patient and separate the appropriate medical information and organize
the data accordingly. Not only does this slow down the transcription
process, but it also introduces additional opportunities for human
error.
• Train doctors when to use the STAT option.
Transcription providers typically staff an account based on an anticipated
amount of reports and the contracted STAT volume to be generated.
Unnecessarily using the STAT designation will likely increase the
hospital’s total volume of STAT jobs, which can disrupt the
account staffing, slow the completion of genuinely urgent projects,
and lead to long-term degeneration of transcription quality and
TAT. Therefore, being compliant with STAT protocols is vital to
ensuring the proper document turnaround for patients with emergency
needs.
• Adopt technology that retrieves and organizes
data automatically. New technology is capable of minimizing the
risk of human error by reducing the need for physicians to enter
codes or follow strict templates. Instead, patient data is automatically
retrieved and recorded in the correct format.
A PDA with an integrated schedule allows the physician
to open his or her schedule on the handheld computer and then tap
the screen to select the appropriate patient. At that point, the
physician’s ID, patient’s medical record number, and
possibly work type and location can be automatically attached to
the voice file the physician enters into the PDA.
Similarly, a PDA or computer on wheels (often referred
to as a COW) can be equipped with a bar code reader. By scanning
the patient’s bar code into the machine, all relevant patient
information is again attached to the digital dictation file.
A tight integration between transcription solution
and electronic health record (EHR) is a benefit to physicians and
will also help manage physician compliance when it comes to dictation.
If the EHR and transcription solution are working together, it will
allow physicians to use a PC-based dictation function to automatically
pull a patient’s historical data into the current voice file
being dictated.
• Offer a variety of dictation options. With
so many options, which one is best? A single dictation method is
rarely able to accommodate the needs of every doctor at a hospital.
HIM managers should provide a range of dictation options so physicians
can choose the method most amenable to their individual work habits.
Physicians will be more compliant, more comfortable, and more appreciative
if they are allowed to select the dictation method.
• Solicit help from your transcription vendor.
A physician’s compliance is easy to monitor. Outside transcription
partners should be able to compile a report on each doctor, including
a compliance percentage and description of any errors. Hospitals
should work closely with the account services department of their
transcription partners to develop solutions that address the specific
noncompliance issues of each physician. The solutions will most
likely include a combination of new technologies and physician training.
• Develop a transcription education program.
Although there are new devices capable of gathering and organizing
data automatically, no technology is capable of completely eliminating
the need for physicians to understand and comply with the transcription
process. With the help of the hospital’s transcription partner,
the HIM manager should develop a communication program to keep doctors
educated about the transcription process. When physicians understand
how mistakes complicate the process and how those complications
can affect patient care, they become attentive to their own compliance
issues.
The HIM staff can take advantage of simple techniques
and new technologies to better manage the compliance of their dictating
physicians. Engaging physicians in the process, providing appropriate
dictation software and hardware, and working with transcription
partners are a few specific ways to accelerate and improve the overall
transcription process.
—
Christopher Rehm, MD, is chief medical officer at Spheris.
.
Subscribe to For
the Record Magazine!
|