October
30, 2006
Keeping
Cancer at Bay
By Tracy Meadowcroft
For The Record
Vol. 18 No. 22 P. 23
Rather than submit to more chemotherapy, a Pennsylvania
woman whose ovarian cancer was in remission opted for a new treatment
method.
Vaccinations are a routine part of many people’s
lives from the time they are small children. Before going to school,
immunizations against ailments such as measles, mumps, rubella, and
chickenpox are standard for youngsters. As adults, some people receive
vaccinations against tetanus, the flu, or even common allergens.
Ongoing trials, though, may add vaccines for cancer
to that list. For Christine Sable, a clinical trial for an ovarian cancer
vaccine may have spared her from a relapse of the potentially fatal
disease, though whether the vaccine is ready for mass marketing remains
undetermined.
Backstory
Sable was diagnosed in May 2003 at the age of 45 with stage 3c ovarian
cancer. “For a few months preceding my diagnosis, I had been experiencing
some mild but annoying, persistent symptoms,” the Lancaster, Pa.,
resident explains. “I had been having some abdominal cramping
which lasted through several menstrual cycles and was clearly not related
to having my period. I also experienced an increase in urinary frequency,
having to go several more times a day or get up in the middle of the
night to relieve myself.”
Additionally, she says she often woke up with lower
back pain, couldn’t lose weight despite a regular exercise routine,
sometimes felt bloated, was more fatigued than usual, and had more headaches.
“But none of these symptoms were severe or anything that would
normally send me running to the doctor,” she says. “What
made me finally go to see a doctor were the persistent cramps and the
urinary frequency.”
The result of that doctor’s visit? “I went
in to my family practitioner on a Thursday and by the following Thursday,
I was having surgery for advanced ovarian cancer,” Sable recalls.
Concerned about Sable’s symptoms, her physician
had ordered ultrasounds—abdominal and transvaginal—for the
day after Sable’s appointment. “After these procedures were
done, the ultrasound technicians would not share any results and, because
they had spent so much time trying to get pictures of the ovaries, I
felt sure something was seriously wrong,” she says. “By
the time I got home from outpatient testing, my phone was ringing. It
was the doctor’s nurse telling me that they had found something
suspicious on the ultrasound and [the doctor] wanted me to go back in
that afternoon for a CT [computed tomography] scan.
“When I asked what the report said, [the doctor’s
nurse] told me that it showed complex masses on both ovaries,”
Sable says. “That answer went through me like a knife. I asked
how large the masses were and she told me about the size of grapefruits.
From that moment on, I knew I had ovarian cancer.”
In addition to the CT scan, her doctor ordered a test
for CA (cancer antigen) 125, a blood protein that is sometimes elevated
in patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer. While waiting for the results,
Sable began searching the Internet for information about her situation.
“To my horror, every symptom I had was on the list,” she
says. “So I kind of figured out exactly what was going on before
I went back in Monday to get the test results from my family doctor.”
The results of Sable’s test showed significant
tumors on both ovaries and throughout her abdominal region; her CA 125
levels were elevated as well.
“Everyone asks me if I ever had any prior health
problems and if there was any history in my family of cancer,”
Sable says. “This cancer completely showed up out of nowhere and
there was no family history, environmental exposure, or other health
reason to explain it. I had been healthy all my life with no serious
illnesses and I did not smoke or take any undue risk with my health.
In fact, I had a number of factors that would normally lower my risk.”
Linda Van Le, MD, a professor in the division of gynecologic
oncology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, says women
usually aren’t aware of the development of ovarian cancer until
the disease has reached an advanced stage. Common symptoms, such as
an enlarging abdomen and gastrointestinal symptoms often attributed
to indigestion, may be vague until women become more fatigued or unable
to eat, “at which point, there’s usually a lot of cancer,”
says Van Le.
“Mortality is anywhere from 30% to 50% at five
years,” adds Van Le.
Treatment
After an appointment with a gynecologic oncologist, Sable underwent
a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo oopherectomy.
“That means I had a complete hysterectomy [removal of the uterus
and cervix] plus the removal of both ovaries and fallopian tubes,”
she explains. “In addition, the surgeon removed my appendix and
a structure called the omentum, which is a protective covering over
the abdominal organs.”
Following her surgery, Sable had six rounds of chemotherapy.
“I went through the usual nausea, fatigue, bone pain, and balding
from the chemotherapy,” she says. “In October 2003, I finished
my last chemo and was declared in remission based on a clear CT scan
and a very low CA 125 test.
“At that time, I was offered additional rounds
of chemo called consolidation therapy—extra chemo cycles that
were supposed to help make the remission stick,” Sable says. “I
turned it down, feeling that my immune system had already been so weakened
and now that I was in remission, I needed to build up that immune system
as much as possible. So no more chemo for me, I decided.”
A Glimmer of Hope
Subsequently, Sable began searching for clinical trials that could offer
her an alternative method for remaining cancer-free.
“Knowing how poor my chances were of living even
five years, I set to work researching all kinds of clinical trials on
the Internet and through other resources. But most of the trials were
just more forms of chemo and I didn’t want that,” says Sable.
Then, while watching the evening TV news, Sable learned
of a vaccine trial at Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI) in Buffalo,
N.Y. She discovered the trial in question was for a vaccine involving
the NY-ESO-1 antigen.
“NY-ESO-1 is the most immunogenic cancer antigen
to date,” says Kunle Odunsi, MD, PhD, associate professor and
research program director in the department of gynecologic oncology
at RPCI. “NY-ESO-1 is not expressed by normal tissues except adult
testis, but it is expressed by a variety of cancers. Based on work at
RPCI, we have determined that the NY-ESO-1 antigen is expressed in a
significant number of ovarian cancer patients.”
The trial involving NY-ESO-1 is part of the Cancer Vaccine
Collaborative (CVC), a partnership between the Ludwig Institute for
Cancer Research (LICR) and the Cancer Research Institute (CRI).
“The purpose of the collaborative is to conduct
single variable, multi-institutional, parallel clinical investigations
to discover the best way to generate effective antitumor immunity in
humans,” explains Odunsi. “While it is clear that cancers
utilize several mechanisms to escape immune attack, there has been no
systematic effort to address the issues affecting the ability to generate
antitumor response.”
Initially limited to New York City, the collaborative
has been expanded to institutions in other countries, including the
United Kingdom, Germany, Switzerland, Japan, and Australia. RPCI became
a site for the CVC in 2002 and is the major site for the ovarian cancer
vaccine program. Scientific expertise, reagents, and administrative/regulatory
oversight for the collaborative are provided by the LICR and funding
for personnel and reagents by the CRI.
“The goal of the NY-ESO-1 vaccination in ovarian
cancer is to prevent the relapse of the disease by immunizing patients
who have completed their treatment and have no evidence of the disease,”
says Odunsi. “In this way, the immune system is taught to be ready
to attack and kill cancer cells if and when they start to relapse.”
When Sable found out about the trial at RPCI, the program
was recruiting for phase 1 patients, of which there would be only 18.
Sable fulfilled the requirements for entering the trial, which included
having completed chemotherapy, being in clinical remission, and having
a clear CT scan. She started the trial in February 2004, with five shots
initially planned for her treatment.
“I ended up getting a total of 20 shots because
I exhibited a very strong immune response to the vaccine and continued
to stay in clinical remission,” says Sable.
Odunsi, the trial physician, explains that vaccines
can be made in several different ways. “A short fragment [peptide]
or the full-length NY-ESO-1 protein can be administered with adjuvants
[immune boosters],” he says. “We have also inserted NY-ESO-1
into viruses so that the immune system is tricked into reacting against
the virus. In the process, it also reacts against the NY-ESO-1 antigen.”
There are numerous challenges to such testing in humans,
according to Odunsi. Those challenges include the ability to make a
reagent that is safe for humans and to obtain adequate funding and support
to conduct laboratory investigations to accompany the testing. “Therefore,
without the CVC, it will be impossible to assemble a critical mass of
investigators that are committed to advancing the field and potentially
bring benefits to cancer patients,” he says.
Those women who were eligible to participate in the
clinical trial at RPCI had tumors that expressed the NY-ESO-1 antigen.
The goals for the trial in which Sable participated are prolonging the
time in which a relapse of the cancer might occur and inducing effective
antitumor immune response, says Odunsi.
The trial at RPCI is limited to ovarian cancer patients
at this point, but there are ongoing CVC trials for patients with other
types of cancers such as melanoma, prostate, bladder, and sarcomas.
Getting the shots required Sable to go to Buffalo once
every three weeks for three days at a time. Following a physical exam,
Sable would receive a shot on the outside muscle of her arm on the first
day of each visit. She would return two days later so a nurse could
examine the injection site for redness, swelling, or a rash, something
Sable never experienced. “I felt normal and could do all my normal
activities. I had no side effects other than a little soreness at the
injection site, much like getting a flu shot,” Sable says.
Sable says the only downside of her participation in
the clinical trial was the traveling and time spent away from her family.
Her visits to RPCI required a two-hour drive to the airport in the Baltimore-Washington,
D.C., area followed by the flight. She frequently went to Buffalo alone
to keep down the cost of lodging and traveling. Sable made a total of
24 trips to Buffalo, finishing her treatment in March 2005.
Current Results
So far, 37 patients have participated in the clinical trial at RPCI.
“We have observed that the vaccines are safe and have no significant
side effects and, in the majority of patients, we were able to induce
immune responses,” says Odunsi. “The patients are currently
in follow-up in order to determine whether the vaccine has prolonged
time to relapse.”
Odunsi says it is too soon to determine, though, whether
the NY-ESO-1 can be marketed the way the recently released cervical
cancer vaccine Gardasil has been.
“I feel extremely fortunate to have participated
in this trial,” says Sable. “While the results are not completely
in yet, I feel very strongly that the vaccine has a great deal to do
with the fact that I am still alive, healthy, and in remission today.”
She adds that her CA 125 level was recently tested and remains low,
“a good sign that my immune system is keeping the cancer in check.
I feel as if I have been given another chance at life and that gives
me a tremendous sense of joy, hope, and gratitude.”
— Tracy Meadowcroft is an editorial assistant
at For The Record.
Subscribe
to For the Record Magazine! |